tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat May 22 06:44:28 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> <-ta'> je

• From: Carleton Copeland <[email protected]>
• Subject: mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> <-ta'> je
• Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 17:45:02 +-400

jatlh pagh:  <-jaj> is found in the appendix.

jatlh voragh:  <-ghach> has its uses, but they are fairly rare.  

These <mojaqmey> are unknown to me.  What types are they, and how are they used?


jatlh qultoQ:  wa'leS vIchoHqa'ta'; wa'leS QaQchoHta'.
jang ter'eS:  Good use of time stamp and aspect! 

I don't quite grasp the aspectual use of <-ta'> in either phrase.  I would have read the first as saying that changes will be resumed and completed simultaneously.  I'm not sure whether the second means "It will become good" or "It will *have* become good"--or is there no difference in Klingon?

qa'ral

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> <-ta'> je
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: <jatlh> - a tip I needed wejmaH Hu'
• Next by Date: Re: mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> <-ta'> je
• Prev by thread: RE: naj
• Next by thread: Re: mojaq <-jaj> <-ghach> <-ta'> je
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level