tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 30 13:25:35 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Qapbe' DujwIj



In a message dated 3/28/1999 9:23:04 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:

<< bItamtaHvIS qab QInmey law' lutu'lu'. Holna' jatlhlu'chu' 'e' 
 leghDI' latlhpu' Holmaj yajchoH. mughojmoH Qanqor. lutmeyDaj 
 QInmeyDaj je potlh law' paQDI'norghDaj potlh puS. >>
===================
I also argued that I do not think {mughojmoH Qanqor} works.  But, no one has
told me why he thinks it does work.  My opinion is that:  we teach a subject,
not a person.  Obviously, the prefix {mu-} indicates a person.

I would have said:   {jIHvaD ghojmoH Qanqor}.

Still open to comments and opinions.

peHruS



Back to archive top level