tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 27 17:45:38 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: DujwIj tI'lu'

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: DujwIj tI'lu'
• Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:04:52 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' charghwI':
>> wot mungDI' <'e'>, nungbogh mu'tlheghDaq qaSbogh wanI' 'oS.
>
>DIp 'oH mu' <<mung>>'e'. DaH SoH vIyajlaHbe', jupwI'. <<nung>>
>Dalo' 'e' DaHech'a'? DaH chaq qayajchoH...

HIvqa' veqlargh.

mu'tlheghvetlh vIghItlhDI', <nungDI'> vIghItlhHa' 'e' vISIv, vaj
mu'ghom vISam 'ej mu' vI'ol.  wa'logh neH vIlughmoH, 'ach mujwI'
law' vItu'be' 'ej vItI'be'.  yajbe'chugh vay', jItlhIj.

>> Qapbe'law' <HIv>, 'ach Qap <chov> 'e' vIchov.
>
>bItlhaQ.

jItlhaQ'a' neH?  jIvalbe''a'?  va. :-)

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: DujwIj tI'lu'
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Aspect
• Next by Date: Re: bogh veng noy'Ighrov (fwd)
• Prev by thread: Re: DujwIj tI'lu'
• Next by thread: Re: Bat'leth
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level