tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 27 16:37:52 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Aspect
ja' peHruS:
>Let's put it this way: If KLI as a corpus wishes to regard the perfective as
>completed action, regardless of what lingusitics textbooks say, because that
>is what MO has given us in TKD, I am quite willing to accede. I will go along
>with {-ta'}'s being another form of perfective, only with intention. {-taH}
>and {-lI'} will not be "imperfective" to me any longer; they will merely be
>"continuous."
>
>We can move on.
.......... .......... ....xx.... ..xxxxxx.. .......... ....xx.... ....xx....
.......... .......... .......... xx......xx .......... ....xx.... ....xx....
xxxx..xx.. xxxxxxxx.. ....xx.... xx......xx xxxxxxxx.. ..xx...... ....xx....
xx..xx..xx ........xx ....xx.... xx......xx ........xx .......... ....xx....
xx..xx..xx ..xxxxxxxx ....xx.... xx......xx ..xxxxxxxx .......... ....xx....
xx..xx..xx xx......xx ....xx.... xx......xx xx......xx .......... ..........
xx..xx..xx ..xxxxxxxx ....xx.... ..xxxxxx.. ..xxxxxxxx .......... ....xx....
.......... .......... ....xx.... ......xx.. .......... .......... ..........
.......... .......... xxxx...... ........xx .......... .......... ..........
-- ghunchu'wI'