tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 04 08:46:04 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC : revised bang bom mu'
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC : revised bang bom mu'
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 11:46:02 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:12:34 -0800 (PST) [email protected] wrote:
> In a message dated 3/1/1999 12:29:14 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> << The whole point of this grammar is to deal with transitive verbs
> with {-moH} added. It is a different grammar from that used on
> intransitive verbs. >>
> ==========================
>
> Has anyone a list of which Klingon verbs have been DETERMINED to be
> transitive, intransitive, or both?
>
> peHruS
This is one of the things I'm tracking in my personal
dictionary, but it is far from conclusive. I just note when a
verb is CLEARLY intransitive (because it has been used
adjectivally) or when it has been used transitively, noting
where these usages occurred. If transitive, I note what the
object was.
It is a work in progress.
charghwI' 'utlh