tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 03 15:01:13 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ghunchu'wI'
In a message dated 3/1/1999 10:52:14 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< pIm qechmey DIyajbogh mung vISampu' 'e' vIHar.
Things get confusing around the word {mung}. It can't be the
subject of {DIyajbogh}, so it must be the object of {vISampu'}.
But if that is true, what is the grammatical relationship
between the stuff in front of {mung} and the stuff including it? >>
===================
I'd like to change this to two sentences.
pIm qechmey DIyajbogh. mung vISampu' 'e' vIHar.
Perhaps, {meq} would be just as good a word here as {mung}.
peHruS