tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 01 11:16:25 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Placement of aspect suffixes

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
• Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 14:16:20 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• Priority: NORMAL

HIvqa' veqlargh!

On Mon, 1 Mar 1999 11:02:31 -0800 (PST) charghwI' 'utlh wrote:
> 
> bIchoHDI' 'e' vIleghDI' qaHarchoH. 

bIchoHta' 'e' vIleghDI' qaHarchoH.
  
> charghwI' 'utlh.

charghwI' 'utlh

• References:
  • Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: KLBC : revised bang bom mu'
• Next by Date: Possible qepHom
• Prev by thread: Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
• Next by thread: Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level