tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 01 10:31:53 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Placement of aspect suffixes
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 13:31:41 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:47:52 -0800 (PST) [email protected]
wrote:
> In a message dated 2/25/1999 3:18:42 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> << qechmey vIchuptaHvIS
> > jIvIDbe' vIneH.
>
> roD qechmey Dachupbe' neH. qechmeylIj motlhbe' DIlajchu' pIj 'e'
> Daqapchu'. pIj bIvID. bISuv DaneHba'. >>
> ====================
>
> The above reply by charghwI' proves he is unwilling to accept peHruS'
> willingness. peHruS stated {jIvIDbe' vIneH} but charghwI' replies {pIj bIvID.
> bISuv DaneHba'}. Present "tense."
>
> Thanks for misreading my message. wejpuH.
QInlIj vIlaDchu'. vIHarbe' neH.
bIchoHDI' 'e' vIleghDI' qaHarchoH. DaH bISuvtaH. DaH bIvID.
bIvIDHa'choHDI' qaHarchoH. ngeD mu'mey. yIvang!
> peHruS
charghwI' 'utlh.