tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 11 08:15:06 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
/be'joy'/ tay Dun
- From: Carleton Copeland <copeland@eycis.com>
- Subject: /be'joy'/ tay Dun
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 19:16:31 +-400
jatlh Zrajm:
>>When I looked through the new words list on www.kli.org I found the
>>following dubious entries:
>>
>>{be'joy'} ritualized torture by women (n) [Sarak, the novel]
>>{Heghba'} ritual suicide (n) [Sarek, novel by A.C. Crispin]
>>
>>Are these canon? And in that case, why? Did Okrand say ok to these words?
jang voragh:
>They're considered canon because novelist Crispin got Okrand to coin a few
>words for her; she acknowledges his help in the book.
Would someone who's read the novel care to describe this <be'joy'> thing? Can anyone get involved?
qa'ral