Re: Aspect

[B52mst3k@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/3/99 12:55:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
aranders@netusa1.net writes:

<< ja' peHruS:
 >...While TKD only
 >uses the words aspect and perfective without further defining these 
terms,...
 
 Open your eyes, man!  TKD *does* adequately define the terms "aspect" and
 "perfective" as they relate to Klingon grammar.
  >>

Didn't we have this argument about two months ago, with the same results 
(plus the loss of a member)?  Why re-open old wounds?  peHruS doesn't seem to 
want to understand TKD and its internal definitions, which are wholly 
inadequate for him.  If he wants to be misunderstood and make a fool of 
himself, HIchaw'. vIpollaH pagh vIpolHa'laH.

T'Lod