tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 04 18:07:16 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Aspect
In a message dated 6/3/99 12:55:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< ja' peHruS:
>...While TKD only
>uses the words aspect and perfective without further defining these
terms,...
Open your eyes, man! TKD *does* adequately define the terms "aspect" and
"perfective" as they relate to Klingon grammar.
>>
Didn't we have this argument about two months ago, with the same results
(plus the loss of a member)? Why re-open old wounds? peHruS doesn't seem to
want to understand TKD and its internal definitions, which are wholly
inadequate for him. If he wants to be misunderstood and make a fool of
himself, HIchaw'. vIpollaH pagh vIpolHa'laH.
T'Lod