tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jul 26 17:59:00 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jIDach (KLBC)

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jIDach (KLBC)
• Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 20:02:38 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <005001bed571$9c4f0e40$4faf9ec1@Noname>

[regarding destinations as objects of locative verbs]

ja' HovqIj:
>No, you wouldn't.  :-)   This rule has been given to us from MO only some
>time ago. When TKD came out nobody knew about this rule, except for Maltz,
>of course.

That rule is at least hinted at in the description of {ghoS} on page 18 of
The Klingon Dictionary:  "The locative suffix *need not* be used on nouns
which are the objects of such verbs." [my emphasis]  The example of using
{-Daq} doesn't exactly match the explanation we received recently, but it
isn't completely contradicted, either.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • -mo'
    • From: "K'ryntes" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: jIDach (KLBC)
    • From: [email protected] (Christiane Scharf)

• Prev by Date: Re: Outra lingua
• Next by Date: conversar em outra lingua
• Prev by thread: Re: jIDach (KLBC)
• Next by thread: -mo'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level