Re: vav jaj

[B52mst3k@aol.com]

In a message dated 7/18/99 12:09:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
whm2m@cms.mail.virginia.edu writes:

<< The one exception to this that he established is {lo'laH}. He 
 did this by the exceptional means of stating that {lo'laH} is a 
 totally separate word from {lo'} which just happens to be 
 spelled exactly like {lo'+laH}. You can still use {lo'} plus the 
 suffix {-laH}, but while it is a homonym, it is not the same 
 word and functions differently.
  >>

vaj, mojaq [-laH] ghajlaH'a' mu' [lo'laH]?


T'Lod