tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jul 02 02:45:34 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC challenge
- From: Carleton Copeland <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: KLBC challenge
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:46:42 +-400
- Encoding: 24 TEXT
ja' charghwI' 'utlh:
I had to pull out the poster and scan it to find the example (since you
didn't offer it) to figure out what you were talking about and then figure
out how to justify it and then express all of this response in Klingon as I
had promised to do.
Guess I was asking a lot--jIDIv--but I wouldn't want to leave you with the
impression that I was mischievously withholding information. qaghelDI'
chovnatlhvetlh vISovbe'. I don't own a BoP poster any more than I've read
the relevant rule in TKD or ever even seen a copy of KGT. As with
everything else I know about Hol, I gleaned this at second-hand from the
Internet--in this case an archived post in which SuStel wrote "there's a
possible exception or two [to the rule against N-5 N constructions] in the
Bird of Prey poster". I've felt the need of constructions like this and
wondered if the poster had made them any more tolerable to the pabpo'pu'.
I'm pleased by your comments and encouragement. Thanks for filling in.