tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 26 12:37:11 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: jIjat
- From: Marc Ruehlaender <ruehli@iastate.edu>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: jIjat
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:37:02 CST
ja' SuStel:
> In an {X-taHvIS Y} situation, you know the following:
>
> (1) X is continuous, because it has the {-taH} suffix.
>
> (2) Y is not continuous, and it is not completed.
>
although this is what TKD says, taken literally, do you
really think this is completely accurate?
would you agree with amending:
> If you want Y to be continuous or completed, you have to use the appropriate
> suffix, for instance:
>
to read "if you want to focus on Y being continous or completed resp., ..."
if not, do you read
> jIyIttaHvIS chal vIlegh.
> While I was walking, I looked at the sky. (The looking is not continous or
> completed.)
>
as "..., I glanced at the sky" as opposed to taking an "ongoing" look at it?
Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
ruehli@iastate.edu