Re: mu'meywIj tetlh

["K'ryntes" <yoshi@surfshop.net>]

WestphalWz@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 1/11/1999 1:42:24 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> yoshi@surfshop.net writes:
>
> << jajmeyvam ghuH jIH law' jIQong puS. >>
>
> I thought we had not accepted this type of sentence, that the law'/puS
> comparison works only on nouns.

Oh no.  I didn't know this was restricted.  Guess I'll dive into the archives and
see what I'm doing wrong.

>  Seems like a good challenge to recast this
> sentence to come up with a sentence that works within the rules of Klingon
> grammar.
>
> I may not get it right, but I'll try:  qaStaHvIS jajmeyvam jIghuH.  law'
> wanI'vam. 'ej jIQong. 'ach puS wanI'vam.
>
> Finally, a question.  Did you record a list of "your words," or is this "your
> list" of words?

My word list.  Does it matter which noun the -wIj goes on?

K'ryntes

>
>
> peHruS