tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 12 10:48:42 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: mu'meywIj tetlh
[email protected] wrote:
> In a message dated 1/11/1999 1:42:24 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> << jajmeyvam ghuH jIH law' jIQong puS. >>
>
> I thought we had not accepted this type of sentence, that the law'/puS
> comparison works only on nouns.
Oh no. I didn't know this was restricted. Guess I'll dive into the archives and
see what I'm doing wrong.
> Seems like a good challenge to recast this
> sentence to come up with a sentence that works within the rules of Klingon
> grammar.
>
> I may not get it right, but I'll try: qaStaHvIS jajmeyvam jIghuH. law'
> wanI'vam. 'ej jIQong. 'ach puS wanI'vam.
>
> Finally, a question. Did you record a list of "your words," or is this "your
> list" of words?
My word list. Does it matter which noun the -wIj goes on?
K'ryntes
>
>
> peHruS