tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 09 11:42:43 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Ordering food

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Ordering food
• Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 14:42:17 EST

In a message dated 1/7/1999 9:01:23 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:

<< 
 Um, no.  {-vaD} is the syntactic marker for the beneficiary of an action.
 In many English sentences, the indirect object is the beneficiary, so it
 is appropriate *in those sentences* to use {-vaD}. >>

ghunchu'wI',

Please refer to TKD Addendum p. 180, section 6.8.  What is the section title?

What does the "fine print" say about IOs and beneficiaries?

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Ordering food
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: qa'vIn
• Next by Date: Re: qepHomHey
• Prev by thread: Re: Ordering food
• Next by thread: Re: Ordering food
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level