tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 23 19:31:36 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: -bogh and -ghach

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: RE: -bogh and -ghach
• Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:31:30 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> A headless clause (e.g. <qaleghbogh>) is just too weird.

Sometimes called a "headless relative" by us odd linguistics types.  ;)

> pagh
> Beginners' Grammarian

-- Holtej 'utlh

• Prev by Date: Re: The vaS'a' joke (was, Re: jatlh)
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: Prefix trick
• Prev by thread: RE: -bogh and -ghach
• Next by thread: Re: -bogh and -ghach
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level