Re: yaSmIn

["William H. Martin" <whm2m@server1.mail.virginia.edu>]

On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 23:47:24 -0800 (PST) "Lieven L. Litaer" 
<lieven@handshake.de> wrote:

> ghItlh charghwI':
> 
> >> >Hotchuq wuSDu'raj.
> >> 'IHbe' mu'qoqvam.
> >
> >qatchuq wuSDu'raj.
> rap. It's too long.

If THAT is your attitude toward kissing, qechmey chu' DapoQ.

> >chaq pe'vI'Ha' Suchopchuq.
> you mean {pe'vIlHa'}. Does that exist?
> What about just {loQ chopchuq}?

I see a big difference. Since {pe'vIl} is an adverbial and we 
know that when it makes sense, they can take {-Ha'} and in this 
case, the meaning of {pe'vIlHa'} is pretty obvious, yes, I think 
it exists.

There are adverbs that do not have obvious meaning with {-Ha'}, 
like {tugh}. Would that be something in the distant future, or 
the past? What is "unsoon"? But "unforcefully" is pretty easy to 
grasp.

> >> maDo'qu' 'e' vItul je jIH 'ej reH taHjaj parmaqmaj.
> >wa'maH chorgh ben bIboghpu''a'? bInajchu'.
> chaq jIQuchqu'mo' jInajtaH :-)

ba'.

> mu'tlheghvam vIchoH: qaStaHvIS poH nI' taH parmaqmaj 'e' vItul. qaq'a'?

maj.

> wa'leS maghomqa'. chaq jIja'.
> 
> "jInajtaHvIS *yaSmIn vIghomjaj." :-)

batlh bInajjaj!

> . Quvar muHwI'

charghwI' 'utlh