Re: Sovchu'wI' (a wise man)

["William H. Martin" <whm2m@server1.mail.virginia.edu>]

On Thu, 4 Feb 1999 06:04:26 -0800 (PST) K'ryntes 
<yoshi@surfshop.net> wrote:

... 
> mataHmeH laHmeymaj tu'Ha' DIDubnIS.
> 
> Why not just make undiscovered an adjective?  Doesn't look so messy that way.

It also doen't look anything like correct this way. {tu'} is a 
transitive verb. It means "discover". It does not mean "be 
discovered". The subject is the one doing the finding. The 
object is the thing being found. You also seem a bit vague on 
the difference between {-be'} and {-Ha'}. I'll assume you've 
seen the other post on that and I'll avoid repeating myself.

Nice try, though, misguided as it was. butlh Daghajba'.

> K'ryntes

charghwI' 'utlh