tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 04 07:34:12 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Sovchu'wI' (a wise man)

On Thu, 4 Feb 1999 06:04:26 -0800 (PST) K'ryntes 
<> wrote:

> mataHmeH laHmeymaj tu'Ha' DIDubnIS.
> Why not just make undiscovered an adjective?  Doesn't look so messy that way.

It also doen't look anything like correct this way. {tu'} is a 
transitive verb. It means "discover". It does not mean "be 
discovered". The subject is the one doing the finding. The 
object is the thing being found. You also seem a bit vague on 
the difference between {-be'} and {-Ha'}. I'll assume you've 
seen the other post on that and I'll avoid repeating myself.

Nice try, though, misguided as it was. butlh Daghajba'.

> K'ryntes

charghwI' 'utlh

Back to archive top level