tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 29 17:22:28 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: qatlh Qapbe'choH DaH De'wI'mey? :-)
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: qatlh Qapbe'choH DaH De'wI'mey? :-)
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:40:25 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999 21:20:06 +0100 Matt Johnson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <l03020904b3ea55b9b5d4@[216.206.111.211]>, Alan Anderson
> <[email protected]> writes
> >QInlIj naQ vIlaDta'. pupbe' pab, 'ach Daj lut.
>
> qatlho', ghunchu'wI'. pupbe' pabwIj 'e' vISov. jIDubmeH, jIqeqnIS.
> QaghmeywIj lugh pabpo'pu'; jIghoj. SovwIj luDubmo', lutmey vIqon.
maj. reH laHmaj wIDubnIS 'ej reH QIn DIqonDI' ghur laHmaj.
> >chut paghDIch bolIjlaw'pu' SoH chamwI' je: rartaH rarwI' 'e' yI'ol. :-)
>
> :-) reH 'ul lughajtaH De'wI''a'mey -- reH luchu'taH. 'ach rarHa'choH De'
> SIrgh. De'wI''a' 'em rar De' SIrgh. De'wI''a' nechchu'ta' Say'moHwI'!
> wejpuH! rarHa''egh *RJ45 rarwI'mey! [teHqu' lut!]
>
> >SKI: Nice story, but you should check to make sure it's plugged in *first*.
>
> SKI: Thanks. But we didn't bank on the troublemaker *moving* the server,
> and RJ45 connectors don't disconnect themselves! :) (And, believe it or
> not, this is a true story...)
>
> Grammar question: when using the -Daq locative with a noun-noun
> construction, where should it go?
Assuming that you mean that the second noun indicates the
location of the action of the verb, it attaches to the second
noun. It wouldn't make sense attached to the first noun, and
that would violate the grammatical rule that the first noun of a
noun-noun construction can't have a Type 5 noun suffix.
> --
> qonwI'
charghwI'