tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 22 00:02:21 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: jatlh pagh KLBC

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: jatlh pagh KLBC
• Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 02:01:25 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja'pu' pagh:
>Also, a verb acting as an adjective cannot take any
> suffix other than <-Ha'>, <-be'> and <-qu'>.

ja' DujHoD:
>I didn't know verbs functioning as adjectives can take {-Ha'} and {-be'}. Did
>I miss something in TKD, or did MO mention this later?

TKD only talks about {-qu'} being permitted on adjectival verbs.  But
examples from elsewhere tell us that the other rovers work.  One of
the audiotapes spoke of {yIH lI'be'} "useless tribbles", and there's
a slang {Duj ngaDHa'} "wildly irresponsible or undisciplined person"
(literally, "unstable vessel") in Klingon for the Galactic Traveler.

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

• References:
  • Re: jatlh pagh KLBC
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: mu'qaD veS / KLBC
• Next by Date: Re: mu'qaD veS / KLBC
• Prev by thread: Re: jatlh pagh KLBC
• Next by thread: Re: a word a day (was: Re: qepHom-)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level