tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Aug 20 13:23:40 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: mu'qaD veS / KLBC
- From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: mu'qaD veS / KLBC
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 13:23:43 -0700
> pagh, charghwI', HomDoj, Seqram, ghunchu'wI' je, peqIm!
HomDoq . . .
> Suvallaw'taH, 'ach langba'qu' 'ej pujbej mongDu'raj.
> QoghIjDu'raj 'ughqu'mo' ngaDmoHmeH mongDechrajDaq
> yIHmey botuQnIS.
Wow. This was perfect. I do have a style comment: with two verbs like
<langba'qu'> and <pujbej>, it's generally better style to put the repeated
subject after the first verb rather than the second. It's not incorrect to
do it the other way, just less common and a little harder to follow.
I also suspect you meant <'ughqu'mo' QoghIjDu'raj>, but the way you have it
has basically the same meaning.
> naDev ponglIj qalIjpu'chugh, vaj HIja'.
> tugh qatIch 'e' vIlay'.
maj.
pagh
Beginners' Grammarian
tlhIngan Hol Mailing List FAQ
http://www.bigfoot.com/~dspeers/klingon/faq.htm