tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Aug 11 22:16:03 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

phonology

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: phonology
• Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 01:18:31 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
• Priority: NORMAL

jIjegh.

Two Marks have convinced me that differing phonological 
descriptive systems can describe the same language with equal 
accuracy. I guess that when I read the first issue of HolQeD 
(being one of about a dozen people to get the first issue when 
it was originally published), I was so impressed by that article 
on Klingon phonology that I got stubbornly attached to it.

jIDochpu'. jIDoghpu'. SatlhIj!

HIvqa' veqlargh!

It was the observation of the absence of {-Iy'} in the language 
that got me. I realized that I was dealing with someone who has 
been paying closer attention to these sounds than I have.

charghwI' 'utlh

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: phonology
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: muSuch tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'
• Next by Date: Re: muSuch tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'
• Prev by thread: Re: RE: Qe' chu' vItu'
• Next by thread: Re: phonology
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level