tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 08 20:37:29 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: KLBG: extra nouns, locative or what?



In a message dated 8/8/99 9:47:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] 
writes:

> 
>  > This is certainly true, but I'll just make a comment on style.
>  > >From the examples MO has given us, I think {ramvam} would more likely
>  > be rendered {DaHjaj ram} (as in pagh's last example).  {ramvam} to
>  > me would be used for later references to a time already stated, eg.:
>  >
>  > wa'Hu' ram *Blair Witch Project* vIlegh, 'ej ramvam jIQongvIpbej.
>  > "I saw BWP last night, and that night was afraid to go to sleep."
>  >
>  > -- ter'eS
>  
>  Hmm, but it says =this= night I was afraid to sleep (delayed reaction?).
>  Wouldn't you say in that example {ramvetlh} for "that (the one I was just
>  talking about) night" ?
>  
>  IOW, I don't see how {ramvam} can mean anything other than "tonight", or
>  when two anteceedents are involved (this one and that one).
>  
>  --John
>  
I said what I ment and I ment what I said.  When I wrote the message it was 
*this night* that I saw the movie and *this night* that I was afraid to go to 
sleep.


quljIb


Back to archive top level