tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 30 21:37:02 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: rut tlhIHDaq jI'IjlaHbe'

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: rut tlhIHDaq jI'IjlaHbe'
• Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 00:03:45 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' peHruS:
>qaStaHvIS poH nI' Dochmey ngu'laHbe' mu'mey {qIm} {jeS} je
>nIteb jISuvpu' 'ej Dochmey ngu'laH bIH 'e' vImaq

'ach qatlh Dochvam Damaq?  chay' Qapbe' <buS>?

>nuvpu' 'IjlaH latlh nuvpu' 'e' vImaq

'ach qatlh Dochvam Damaq?

What evidence do you offer that {qIm} and {jeS} and now {'Ij} can be
used transitively?  Why do you *want* to use them transitively?  What
do you gain from this interpretation?  I don't understand either your
reason or your reasoning.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • rut tlhIHDaq jI'IjlaHbe'
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: Cutaway poster of Bird of Prey
• Next by Date: Re: QEPHOMMEY
• Prev by thread: rut tlhIHDaq jI'IjlaHbe'
• Next by thread: Re: rut tlhIHDaq jI'IjlaHbe'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level