tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 04 08:00:47 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: yInwIj lut
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: yInwIj lut
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 11:00:45 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Tue, 3 Nov 1998 20:58:21 -0800 (PST) "Dr. Jeremy Cowan"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ja' ghunchu'wI'
> >bIratlhtaH'a'?
>
> jISovbe'
> jabbI'IDmeyvam vIlaD poH chIm vItu'chugh
maQumDI' chIm'a' poH?
> >SID naQ DapIvmoH'a'? qam neH DapIvmoH'a'?
>
> SID naQ pIvmoHbogh Qel'e' tu'lu'chugh vaj qub
> potlh qamDu'
> pIvbe'chugh qamDu' vaj pIv porgh naQbe'
mu'tlheghvam vIlaDchoHDI' taQlaw', 'ach jIQubDI' bIjatlhchu'
'e' vItlhoj. chaq pIv porgh HochHom 'ach naQbe' pIvbogh porgh.
> >>DIron Dov'agh vIHengchu'
> >>'ach DIron qebchu'be'
> >
> >vaj chuSchu'be' je. :-P
>
> DIron vIqebtaHvIS jIchuSqu'chu' 'ach jI'eybe'bej
'eybe'bej QoQlIj, 'ach bI'ey 'e' vIqelQo'. naH neH vISop.
> ja' charghwI'
> >> je''egh
> >
> >ghaytan rav raS je je' je.
>
> wa'Hu' rav raS je lam law'
> DaHjaj rav raS je lam puS
> wa'leS rav raS je Say' law'
>
> (NB: I assume that the preceeding is not correct grammar. I do not
> condone the use of the preceeding structure. It is however, a handy way
> to express this. What do you guys think?)
moH. cha' mu'tlhegh nI' DapoDmoH DaneHlaw' 'ach pab DaDuDpu'.
moHqu'.
> >> wot lo'laHbe' 'ach mu'mey puS jatlh 'ej law' mu'tlheghmey yajbogh
> >
> >cha' Hol yaj'a'?
>
> vIra'taHvIS 'ej vIyu'taHvIS *Spanish Hol neH vIjatlh
*Spanish* Hol Dalo'taHvIS *kilt* DatuQ'a'?
> chay' jang ghaH *English Hol jatlhlu'taHvIS
qatlh chotlhob? pa' SoH 'ej pa' ghaH. naDev jIH. ghaH
vIQoylaHbe' 'ej vIleghlaHbe'.
> tlhIngan Hol jatlhbe' 'ej yajbe'
Do'Ha'.
> janSIy
charghwI'