tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 02 09:31:54 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: -ghach
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: -ghach
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 12:11:22 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Neal Schermerhorn" at Oct 30, 98 09:52:41 pm
According to Neal Schermerhorn:
...
> <whine>
> When do we find a reason to use <lo'laHghach> anyway? <lo'laHghach ghaj 'oH>
> is, bluntly, crap compared to <lo'laH 'oH> (It is valuable) and I personally
> prefer something better, though I have no clue what. I just hate the
> <lo'laH> situation, but it is Klingon.
> </whine>
qeylIS betleH lo'laHghachna' vuvlaHbe' verengan. Huch lI'be'
vuvlaH neH.
> vIngDI' tlhIngan SuvwI', ghu' cherghlaH pagh net Sov.
Qobbej ghu'.
> Qermaq
charghwI' 'utlh