tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 11 17:32:52 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: -ghach (oh no)
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: -ghach (oh no)
- Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 18:25:37 -0400
From: Qov <[email protected]>
>And, it's got to be said, while I agree it seems that the nominalization
of
>a process is what's happening, that *isn't* what Okrand has said.
I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying Okrand doesn't explicitly
mention nominalization? What about page 176 of TKD: "{-ghach} nominalizer"?
SuStel
Stardate 98359.8