tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 04 12:59:40 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: -bogh
According to [email protected]:
>
> Oops!
>
> >{naDevDaq yIjaH} nI' vaj {naDev} vIjatlh.
>
> This should read:
>
> nI' {naDevDaq yIjaH}
>
> ghIlqer
>
At the risk of duplicating responses, I feel a need to leap in
here and nip this in the bud. {naDev} is one of those special
nouns that already implies locative meaning, so it never gets
{-Daq} added to it.
As for how to convey this meaning, I think you'd be better off
with {yIchol!} or {yIcholchu'!}, or, in most cases, simply
{Ha'!}
charghwI'