tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 18 14:14:10 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: SIS
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: SIS
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 19:03:47 -0400
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>In a message dated 98-06-15 20:53:48 EDT, SuStel writes:
>
><<
> Hogh bID
> half of the week? >>
>
>What canon do we have on the placement of {bID}. I thought it is a number,
>which means I would have placed it BEFORE the noun.
I never said there was canon. That's what the "?" is there for. It follows
with my analysis, presented some time ago. If {bID} works the same as
{Hoch}, {HochHom}, and {'op} (something I think likely, given that it's a
noun and not a number), then it will probably go along with the logic of the
argument.
Hoch Hogh
each week
Hogh Hoch
all of the week
bID Hogh
half of the weeks
Hogh bID
half of a week
This is speculation, not fact, and not conclusive.
SuStel
Stardate 98461.2