tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 09 09:39:44 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: jIQuch
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: jIQuch
- Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 19:17:38 -0400
From: Christiane Scharf <[email protected]>
>ja' charghwI':
>
>> > Qu' wejDIchvaD juHDaq ghItlh'a' vIqonnIS. ja'chuqnIS Qu' loSDIchvaD
>> > jeSbogh nuvpu'.
>>
>> nuqjatlh? I've never seen a relative clause with its own
>> indirect object before.
nuqjatlh? Sure you have, the last time we had that really long discussion
about the placement of Type 5's in relative clauses.
I certainly find this sentence confusing, though.
SuStel
Stardate 98436.6