tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 17 04:32:46 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Indirect objects?
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Indirect objects?
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 16:48:35 -0400
From: Robyn Stewart <[email protected]>
>We know that /-vaD/ can be used to indicate an indirect object. We
>have seen the prefix trick. If all /<noun>-vaD/s are eligible for the
>prefix trick, then /tuQDoq mulo'DI'/ is acceptable. I personally hate
>it, but many things about the world continue to exist despite my
>hatred for them. This may be one of them.
moHaq chut le' nunobpa' Okrand (sic!), reH jIbep Qochbe'DI' moHaq DIp je.
<-vaD> yIlo' jIjatlh.
jImuj. lugh latlhpu'. QochnISbe'ba' moHaq DIp je. 'ach DaH mo'wIj
luyajchoH latlh jay'!
SuStel
Stardate 98625.2