tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 28 08:18:03 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Refining our ideas on indirect objects



mughItlh SuStel
>I don't think so.  You're just fiddling with English words, not Klingon 
>concepts.  Klingon doesn't have different prepositions, it's got {-vaD} to

>represent the beneficiary of an action.
>
>Try to forget English entirely and analyze the problem from a Klingon
point of 
>view.

choyajHa'.  I'm not thinking of English prepositions, I'm thinking of the
concepts of English prepositions.  It's hard to explain.
Qapla'
qoror


Back to archive top level