tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 24 07:19:27 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: exclamations

• From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: exclamations
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 10:08:30 -0400

ghItlh ter'eS
>I also don't think of {majQa'} meaning "'maj'-er".  With {maj}, a
>situation is good.  With {majQa'}, a situation is really good.

I thought, ever since I saw the word, that it could be argued that {-Qa'}
is an archaic form of {-qu').
Qapla'
qoror

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: to work
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: -ghach
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: exclamations
• Next by thread: Klingon Name
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level