tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 23 19:08:40 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: mung tlhIngan-Hol
ja'pu' ~mark:
>"OVS" lo' "Navajo" 'e' vIQoy'pu'be'. lo' 'e' vIHarbe'law' jIH. 'a
>mIwvetlh lo'bogh Holmey tu'lu'. 'oH lo'law' "Hixkaryana" 'e'
>vIQoy'pu'. qubqu' mIwvam, 'ach mobchu'be'law' tlhIngan Hol.
ja' Qov:
>Watch those type-7s after {'e'} ~mark. :) I swear Marc made up that
>rule just to annoy us.
We do have canon examples that violate the rule; they're pretty common on
the Skybox cards. I suspect the dialect of the Sakrej region :-) does not
prohibit aspect suffixes on the second verb of a sentence-as-object but I
have no real evidence to support it.
-- ghunchu'wI'