tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 23 11:22:05 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: that old joke
- From: "Robyn Stewart" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: that old joke
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 11:22:04 PST
- Organization: NLK Consultants, Inc.
- Priority: normal
charghwI':
>loS 'uS wa' DeS je ghaj nuq?
>
>targh Quchqu'!
>
>It works because so far as we know, the way a very happy targ
>has four legs is different from the way he has one arm, so it is
>unexpected that the four legs and one arm fall into the same set of
>things (things that a very happy targ has).
DaH jIHagh. reH qIDvam vIyajHa'pu'. ngaghrup targh 'e' vIHar. nuv
Sop targh 'e' vISovbe'.
>> {qagh QaQ law' pagh QaQ puS}
>> can I use this for "better"?
>ghobe'. Besides, anyone suggesting this, even in jest, is likely
>marked for death. Imagine walking up to a gang leader in a violent
>drug neighborhood and very badly telling a racial joke which
>attempts to make fun of the subculture embraced by the gang leader
>you are telling it to.
Huh? He's asking if {X QaQ law' Y QaQ puS} works for better. It
does. pagh qagh nuS.
- Qov