tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 17 20:06:32 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: wejmaH

• From: "Neal Schermerhorn" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: wejmaH
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 23:09:40 -0400

ghItlh Eric:

>> wejmaH ben jIbogh. DaHjaj 'oH qoSwIj'e'. loSmaH ben jIboghpu' 'e' DIv   
>jup.
>> qarHa'qu'!
>
>nuqjatlh? My friend is guilty that I am forty? Have we seen DIv used in   
>this way?
>

Hivqa' veqlargh! 'be guilty' and 'guess' aren't even next to each other!
Good reasomn to always proofread!

loSmaH ben jIboghpu' 'e' meb jup.

-lughbe'bogh je Qermaq qanbe' 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: wejmaH
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: KLBC: lutthlaq Saja'
• Next by Date: Re: mung tlhIngan-Hol
• Prev by thread: RE: wejmaH
• Next by thread: Re: wejmaH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level