tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Sep 11 07:06:25 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: qaStaHvIS poH jIQubtaH

• From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: qaStaHvIS poH jIQubtaH
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 10:01:12 -0400

ghItlh charghwI'
>Oh, and as far as we know, there IS not transitive sense of
>{meQ}. All canon examples so far use it intransitively, so we
>know you can use {meQmoH} to get your meaning.

No.  As I said, there's a transitive example of {meQ} in KGT, under
"Avoiding Gaffes": {to'waQ meQ vutwI'}.
Qapla'
qoror

• Prev by Date: Re: 5 min. Conversations
• Next by Date: Re: your mail
• Prev by thread: Re: qaStaHvIS poH jIQubtaH
• Next by thread: KLBC: (Requiem) loS'DIch 'ay'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level