tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 05 10:50:18 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC:Re:be'nI'HeywI'
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC:Re:be'nI'HeywI'
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 97 17:31:53 UT
[email protected] on behalf of William H. Martin wrote:
> I'm hesitant to assume {'Ij} to be transitive, simply because
> the definition doesn't sound transitive and we have no canon use
> of it so far proving otherwise. To get around this, I'd use:
>
> QoQwIj vIchu'DI' Haw' be'nI'wI'.
>
> Your sister doesn't care what you are listening to. She dislikes
> what she hears. Your listening is inconsequential. It is your
> PLAYING the music that sends her from the room.
{chu'} is "play (a musical instrument), not "play music (as on a radio)."
Unless he is actually playing the instrument, he cannot say this.
QoQwIj vIQoytaHvIS Haw' be'nI'wI'
--
SuStel
Stardate 97680.3