tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 25 08:12:35 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: mu'tlheghvam vIyajbe'
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: mu'tlheghvam vIyajbe'
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 11:12:19 -0500 (EST)
In einer eMail vom 25.11.97 07:38:40 MEZ, schreiben Sie:
> I asked:
> > I've read this:
> >
> > << {DaH mu'tlheghvam vIqelnIS
> > quv'a', yabDaq San vaQ cha' pu' je SIQDI?} >>
[discussion cut]
> THAT is better. See what a difference one {'} letter makes?! Either
> your source or your copying omitted the {'} on SIQDI' and added one
> on {cha}. I suspect you, as you also left off a {'} on the
> {*vIyajbe} in your subject. :-)
GGRRRR.
I did pay attention while copying and I'm sure there is an apostrophe on
{cha'}, and there was none on {SIQDI'}. I don't have the source here, but I
am sure it was like that. I suspect the source, as it also left off a {'} on
the {SIQDI'}. But I still might be wrong, and yabHuj could maybe verify it
:-)
> - Qov
muHwI'
IKV Fek'lhr
Dark Vengeance Fleet
http://members.aol.com/Lieven/