tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Nov 18 14:35:21 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Question as object

• From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Question as object
• Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 17:29:46 -0500

ghItlh peHruS
>peHruS here:
>
>The construction is very, very weird to English-speaking minds.  But it is
>not nonsense to Klingon minds.  There are two separate sections in TKD,
>Relative Clauses and Sentences as Objects.
>
>The message the second paragraph above sends to me is that even the most
>experienced Terrans studying tlhIngan Hol have overlooked the true content
of
>TKD 6.2.5.

Heghpu'bogh Sargh DabIj 'e' yImev!  juyIv Hoch.
Qapla'
qoror

• Prev by Date: Re: maHagh tlhInganpu' (was:Klingon words for "subject"...)
• Next by Date: Re: verb suffixes in comparative clauses?; male animals
• Prev by thread: Re: Question as object
• Next by thread: Re: Question as object
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level