tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 17 23:06:43 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: lotHomwIj
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: lotHomwIj
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 02:06:31 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 97-11-10 15:08:11 EST, charghwI' writes:
<< bangwI' HaqnISlu'. pIvlaw'pu' nIm DaqDu'Daj 'ach wa' nIm
DaqDajDaq ghurtaH cha' Daqmey Qob 'e' 'ang Qel jan le'. tugh wa'
nIm Daq teqlu'be'chugh vaj Hegh. >>
--------------------peHruS here:
Again, I have found writing by charghwI' with which I must disagree.
First he introduces nIm Daq as two words which Klingon identifies as a Noun -
Noun Construction (TKD 3.4). Fine. But, then he uses nIm Daq after the
number wa' as if he had invented a compound noun (TKD 3.2.1).
I believe the correct is: nIm wa' Daq instead of wa' nIm Daq or wa' nImDaq.
Comments?
peHruS