tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 14 07:34:57 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Type 7 suffix and {-jaj}

• From: m109 <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Type 7 suffix and {-jaj}
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 15:06:16 +0000
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

>If verbs with {-jaj} never take an aspect suffix (TKD pp. 175-6), how come
>we can say {wo' DevtaHjaj ghawran} (KGT p. 26)?

Why not, if it is appropriate, use adverbs to indicate timescale, as in
reH tlhIngan wo' taHjaj
This also shows another way that a sense of may *something* continue
using the verb taH (taHjaj)

qelayn
-- 
m109

• References:
  • Type 7 suffix and {-jaj}
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: ghunlu'wI'
• Next by Date: KLBC: Warriors Prayer Part 1
• Prev by thread: Type 7 suffix and {-jaj}
• Next by thread: Re: Type 7 suffix and {-jaj}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level