tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 06 23:29:40 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: be'pu'

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: be'pu'
• Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 02:29:08 -0400 (EDT)

In a message dated 97-05-07 02:00:45 EDT, you write:

<< > Stardate 97323.1 jatlh charghwI':
 .. 
 > > *Kellie* 'Iv? >>

Based on TKD's {SoH 'Iv}, perhaps a Klingon idiomatic usage rather than an
example of correct grammar, you could say {Kellie 'Iv}.

'ach jIQuch
{'Iv ghaH Kellie'e'} vImaSchu'

peHruS

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: Conversational Klingon
• Next by Date: bomchuq qamDu'maj
• Prev by thread: Re: RE: be'pu'
• Next by thread: RE: be'pu'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level