tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 08 15:24:42 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: "nuqneH" Sajatlh
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: "nuqneH" Sajatlh
- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 97 22:11:19 UT
jatlh qoror:
> ghunchu'wI' wrote:
> >Actually, the example with {chen} is interesting. The "official"
> definition of {chen} is "take form"; he is translating it instead
> as "be formed".<
>
> qoror here. I suppose you're right with that particular part, but some of
them
> are causing something to "do" and some are causing something to "be done."
It doesn't matter. However you *translate* it, the Klingon remains the same!
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97185.3