tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 19 02:24:01 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

mup vs. qIp

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: mup vs. qIp
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 05:23:30 -0400 (EDT)

Thanks, ghunchu'wI'

Until I saw {yIQeqQo' neH!  DoS yIqIp} in TKW, I would have thoroughly agreed
with your post expounding {mup}.  Adding to my confusion, however, was
{mupwI'}.  Apparently {*nail* qIp mupwI'} in that "hammer" is an implement
and TKD glossed {qIp} as "hit with an implement."

If I had been making up the abovementioned TKW entry, I would have used {DoS
yImup}.  Since I am wrong, it turns out, I am confused.  At this time, I side
with SuStel that we need to see how MO uses {mup}.

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: mup vs. qIp
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: HeghmoH
• Next by Date: RE: Klingon Dictionary File
• Prev by thread: KLBC: HeghmoH
• Next by thread: Re: mup vs. qIp
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level