tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 06 05:18:42 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: -jaj on indefinite subjects

• From: Marian Schwartz <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: -jaj on indefinite subjects
• Date: 06 Jun 97 08:16:26 EDT

ghItlh Jason Coyle
>  I was looking to say "May you always be challenged", and I came up with
>
>    reH DaqaDlu'jaj
>
>  or maybe
>
>    DaqaDlu'taHjaj
>
>  My question:  Can -lu' be translated this way with -jaj?  

Why not?  What's wrong with a Type 5 suffux with a Type 9 suffix?  Also witness
"QuvlIjDaq yIHmey tu'be'lu'jaj," mentioned by others.

>I can't think of a more "active" way to phrase this, short of  *reH qaDmey
Danejjaj*
>which isn't quite the same thing.

If you wanted it to be active, how about:

reH qaDmey DaHevjaj

Qapla'
qoror

• Prev by Date: Re: jatlhwI' pegh
• Next by Date: RE: Sojtaj* (was RE: Kosher)
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: -jaj on indefinite subjects
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: -jaj on indefinite subjects
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level