tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jun 01 15:46:22 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: thrusters, etc.

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: thrusters, etc.
• Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 17:49:47 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Scott Inman writes:
>>ghobe'. <<neHmaH>> jatlhchu' Qugh!
>>charghwI'
>
>Why does everyone keep assuming I know tlhIgan-Hol fluently?!? I DO NOT!!!!!

loS mu' neH ghItlhta' charghwI'.  moHaq mojaq joq Hutlh wej.
loS mu' DamughmeH, Qatlhqu''a' Qu'lIj?

Surely you can make the effort to look up *four* words, only one of which
has any affixes?

>PLEASE when you respond to one of my letters, I BEG you to respond in
>Federation
>Basic!

"Basic" maS 'Iv jay'?  jIghuntaHvIS "Basic" vIlo'chugh, *gharghngoq rur.

I'd prefer Federation Pascal or Federation Ada, myself.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: thrusters, etc.
    • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: thrusters, etc.
    • From: Scott Inman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC: Sufix #9 ghach
• Next by Date: Re: ro'qegh'Iwchab mIw
• Prev by thread: Re: thrusters, etc.
• Next by thread: Re: thrusters, etc.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level