tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jun 01 11:53:57 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Sufix #9 ghach
- From: "Neal Schermerhorn" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Sufix #9 ghach
- Date: Sun, 1 Jun 97 18:54:02 UT
ghItlh SuStel DaH 'e' vIlegh
>ghob Sov je chevbe'.
>
>I used {-be'} and not {-Ha'} because all I want to say is that this is not
>done, not that it is undone. To be undone, it must first be done. To
>unseparate, they must first be separate.
'ej tugh ghItlh
>ghob Sov je' chevbe'lu'
'ach mu'tlheghvam vIghItlh
>ghob Sov je chevHa'lu'
I used -Ha' because the intention here is to say that they walk together, that
they are inseperable. Yet it is clear that I was incorrect - chevHa'lu' does
indeed translate as "Someone 'un-separates' them," or "Something combines
them."
SuStel, qatlho'. qarqu' SoH. nujuSDI' nem chaq nIbchaH laHwIj