tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 29 05:40:08 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ghe''or 'elmeH vegh
- From: Guido <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: ghe''or 'elmeH vegh
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 08:40:04 -0400 (EDT)
Seqram:
>'elpa' Hoch, 'el? I know it's not specified, but -logh and -DIch on the
>same word feels like two suffixes of the same type. It doesn't seem
>right. -logh is multiplicity of times, and -DIch is ordinal... they don't
>mix.
ghunchu'wI':
>ghe''or 'elbogh yInwI' wa'DIch ghaH. nap.
nap 'a 'IHbejbe'. motlh neH mu'tlhegh. Ha' bomDaq motlhtaHvIS neH, Dal je
mu'mey. mIw'e' chuppu'bogh Seqram vImaS, 'a chaq yajbe'lu'. "ghe''or 'el
ghaH, 'elpa' Hoch yInwI'" 'oHchugh mu'tlhegh'e', tugh 'elrup je latlh
yInwI', bong 'e' Qub'a' laDwI'. vaj wanI' tlhegh QubmoH'a' "-pa'" mojaq?
toH, ghunchu'wI' vIHeQqanglaw', mu'Daq quqlaHbe'mo' -DIch -logh je. ngoDvam
vIHarchoHmeH DIch chonob. vIpumlu'meH, "malglico" jIH, qar'a'? {{:-)
toH, nuqDaq 'oHtaH ghe''or'e', 'ej chay' pIm ghe''or "Hell" je?
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|~~~~G~~U~~I~~D~~O~~~~~~~
|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|